Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Thatch v. Ferrell et al
as 1:2021cv00143
Plaintiff:
Frederick A. Thatch
Defendant:
Britton Ferrell and Joe Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lozoya v. City of Cloquet et al
as 0:2021cv00990
Defendant:
County of Carlton, Carey Ferrell, Scott Beckman and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Lozoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis et al v. Neal et al
as 4:2019cv00770
Defendant:
Justice Ferrell, John Does, Rowdy Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Margie Curtis and Larry Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Templeton et al v. Dotson et al
as 4:2014cv02019
Plaintiff:
Alexis Templeton , Maureen Costello , Brittany Ferrell and others
Defendant:
Sam Dotson , Jon Belmar and Ronald Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota et al v. Daugaard et al
as 4:2011cv04071
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota and Carol E. Ball
Defendant:
Dennis Daugaard , Marty Jackley , Doneen Hollingsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duane Yates v. John Baldwin, et al
as 10-1429
Petitioner - Appellant:
Duane Yates
Respondent - Appellee:
John Baldwin, Cornell Smith, John Ault and others
Kezer v. Ferrell et al
as 1:2009cv00109
Plaintiff:
Joshua C. Kezer
Defendant:
William F. Ferrell, Brenda Schiwitz and Scott County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Yates v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2009cv03004
Petitioner:
Duane Yates
Respondent:
John Baldwin, Cornell Smith, John Ault and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
