Cases 11 - 20 of 103
Yaritz v. Underwriter of Rush City/Moose Lake et al
as 0:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Harold Yaritz
Defendant:
Underwriter of Rush City/Moose Lake, Paul Schnell, Michelle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Frakes
as 4:2022cv03115
Petitioner:
Clifford L. Rush
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mondor v. MCF-Rush City Nursing Staff et al
as 0:2022cv01002
Plaintiff:
David Michael Mondor
Defendant:
MCF-Rush City Nursing Staff and Wendy Anglo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rushing v. State of Missouri
as 4:2021cv01104
Plaintiff:
Shaun Rushing and Bilbo Grant
Defendant:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennington v. Watson et al
as 4:2020cv01420
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, R Watson, Leslie Rutledge and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Pennington, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rushing v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00105
Plaintiff:
Demarius S Rushing
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, Amy Newhuse and Jeremy Larson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rushing v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00337
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, Amy Newhuse and Jeremy Larson
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Plaintiff:
Demarius S. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00017
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Terrance Dion Rush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rush v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00012
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Terrance Dion Rush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McLaughlin v. Rush et al
as 6:2019cv03154
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee McLaughlin
Defendant:
Benjamin Burkstressor, Kenneth Thompson and David P Rush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
