Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Sandlin v. Clemmons et al
as 2:2010cv00031
Plaintiff:
Christopher R Sandlin
Defendant:
Faron R Clemmons, Artis Ray Hobbs, Moses Jackson, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Jackson et al
as 2:2010cv00004
Plaintiff:
Atomic Hill, Jr
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Clemmons, Lester Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandlin v. Humphrey et al
as 2:2009cv00051
Plaintiff:
Christopher R Sandlin
Defendant:
Micheal T Humphrey, Seccer Cole, Henry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Harmon et al
as 2:2009cv00044
Plaintiff:
David Williams
Defendant:
Greg Harmon, Moses Jackson, Ray Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clemmons v. Irby et al
as 4:2008cv04178
Plaintiff:
Chad Clemmons
Defendant:
Irby, Crider, Ford and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Long v. Gay et al
as 2:2008cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael E Long, Jr
Defendant:
William Gay, Clemmons, Kathy Purdue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Williams v. Greg Harmon, et al
as 07-3800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
Greg Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Ray Hobbs, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections and others
Clemmons v. USA
as 4:2007cv00642
Respondent:
USA
Movant:
Antonio Clemmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cantrell v. Beebe et al
as 4:2007cv00692
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Shane Cantrell
Defendant:
Mike Beebe, Westbrook, Greg Hasmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blodgett v. Baker et al
as 1:2007cv00060
Plaintiff:
Ricky Joe Blodgett
Defendant:
Mark Baker, Chris Clemmons, Jim Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
