Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Clark v. United States et al
as 4:2018cv00524
Petitioner:
Sacorey Lennel Clark
Respondent:
United States, U.S. Attorney General, Rodney W. Sippel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jensen v. Sneider et al
as 8:2018cv00104
Plaintiff:
Faith Jensen
Defendant:
Lancaster County Sheriff and Jason Sneider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Gilbertson et al
as 3:2017cv03023
Plaintiff:
Franklin Sandoval Nelson
Defendant:
David E. Gilbertson, Glen A. Severson, Steven L. Zinter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jensen v. United States of America
as 4:2017cv00173
Petitioner:
Jennifer Marie Jensen
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Green v. Burl et al
as 5:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Rickie Green
Defendant:
Danny Burl , Aundrea F Fitzgerald , Eva S Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wickner v. Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2017cv00792
Plaintiff:
Lance Wickner
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, Shelby R. Richardson, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Frakes et al
as 8:2016cv00391
Defendant:
Margaret Antley, Fred Britten, Unknown Busboom and others
Plaintiff:
David M. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Batista v. United States of America
as 0:2016cv00794
Plaintiff:
Luis M. Batista
Defendant:
United States of America and Noel Jensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reginald Dunahue v. Randy Watson, et al
as 16-1606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Reginald L. Dunahue
Defendant - Appellee:
Randy Watson, Warden, Varner Max, Mark Stephens, Captain, Varner Max, Kennie Bolden, Chief of Security, Varner Max and others
Dunahue v. Watson et al
as 5:2015cv00382
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lamont Dunahue
Defendant:
Randy Watson, Mark Stephens, Kennie Bolden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
