Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Malone v. Springfield Police Department
as 6:2018cv03421
Defendant:
Springfield Police Department
Plaintiff:
James Barry Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Adams et al
as 4:2018cv04159
Defendant:
Officer D. Rogers, D R Morgan, Warden Jeffie Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis E Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Adams et al
as 4:2018cv00869
Defendant:
Jeffie Walker, DR Morgan, Golden Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis E Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward-Malone v. United States of America
as 5:2018cv04061
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Christopher J Ward-Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hamre v. Moorhead, City of et al
as 3:2018cv00142
Defendant:
Tristan Jones Van de Streek, Moorhead, City of, Robert Matheson and others
Plaintiff:
John Phillip Hamre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paxton v. McBride et al
as 5:2017cv00293
Plaintiff:
Barry Paxton
Defendant:
Iris McBride, Cory Evans, Michelle Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamre v. Swan et al
as 3:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
John Phillip Hamre
Defendant:
Philip C.R. Swan, Brent Malone, Wade L. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spears v. Cook et al
as 3:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Spears, Jr
Defendant:
Dale Cook, Andrew Harris, Clayburn Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. United States Parole Commission
as 4:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Herbert Phillip Malone
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
John Williams v. Randy Watson, et al
as 17-1019
Plaintiff - Appellee:
John Henry Williams
Defendant:
Debra York, Infirmary Administrator, Varner, Ludlam, Dental Assistant, Varner, Stephens, Captain, Shift Commander, Varner Super Max and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Randy Watson, Warden, Varner, Moses Jackson, Assistant Warden, Varner, Bolden, Major, Chief of Security, Varner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
