Cases 61 - 70 of 666
Huntimer v. Young et al
as 4:2023cv04005
Defendant:
Darren Young, Rachel Schults, Sierra Unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Huntimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlos Wade v. Bill Stange, et al
as 22-3609
Petitioner / Appellant:
Carlos Wade
Respondent / Appellee:
Bill Stange, Warden, Southeastern Correctional Center and Eric Stephen Schmitt
Fisher v. Stange
as 1:2022cv00139
Petitioner:
Brandon Eugene Fisher
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McVay v. Stange
as 1:2022cv00130
Petitioner:
Lamar McVay
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aaron v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01113
Plaintiff:
Kameon V Aaron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Marshall Reed, Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios Rosa v. Stange et al
as 1:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Angel Rios Rosa
Defendant:
Bill Stange, Charles Reed and Molly Lieja
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Stange et al
as 1:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Lamont Williamson, Godzilla and tutor title
Defendant:
Warden Bill Stange and Clifton Cossey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sean Krier v. Derek Gosnell, et al
as 22-3095
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sean Edward Krier
Defendant / Appellee:
Derek Gosnell, Captain, Weston Weathington, Captain, Bruce Billings and others
Shore v. Stange
as 6:2022cv03230
Petitioner:
Curtis J Shore
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boots v. Johnson et al
as 0:2022cv01894
Plaintiff:
Bill M. Boots
Defendant:
Nathan Johnson, Kevin Carlson, Richard O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
