Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gray v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
as 4:2019cv03063
Plaintiff:
Graylin Gray
Defendant:
Harbans Deol, Scott R. Frakes, Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Watson et al
as 6:2019cv06025
Defendant:
Derrick Barnes, Myles B. Karr, Jason Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. Johnson County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2018cv02153
Defendant:
Johnson County Sheriff's Department, John & Jane Doe 1-20, Johnson County, Arkansas and others
Plaintiff:
Shanna Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble et al v. Minnesota State-Operated Services et al
as 0:2016cv02720
Plaintiff:
David Le Roy Gamble, Jr., Cyrus Patrick Gladden, II, David James Jannetta and others
Defendant:
Minnesota State-Operated Services , Minnesota State Industries , Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felipe Mendez, Jr. v. John Courter, et al
as 15-2338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Felipe Mendez, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
John Courter, AUSA/S.D. Iowa, Daniel Davis, DEA agent, Mark Taylor, ADA Polk County Iowa and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv03506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Frank v. Madison County Sherriffs Department et al
as 4:2014cv03184
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-20, John Does 1-20, Kotrous and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Alan Frank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donna Nichols v. Douglas Weber, et al
as 12-3488
Movant - Appellant:
Donna Nichols
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Donald E. Moeller
Defendant - Appellee:
Douglas Weber, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, Dennis Kaemingk, Secretary of South Dakota Department of Corrections, in his official capacity and Does 1 - 20, unknown employees or agents of the South Dakota Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
