Cases 91 - 100 of 126
England v. Cox et al
as 4:2012mc09008
Plaintiff:
Shane England
Defendant:
Toby Ray Cox and PPC Transportation Co
Interested_party:
New Liberty Hospital District
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Toby J. Sutton v. Patricia Bailey, et al
as 12-1276
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Toby Sutton
Defendant - Appellant:
Patricia Bailey, Individually & in Official Capacity as Vice-Chancellor of Academic & Student Affairs and Kellie Thomas, Individually & in Official Capacity as Director of Instruction
Hayes et al v. Heineman et al.
as 4:2011cv03229
Plaintiff:
Matthew Adams, Eric J. Aho, Jr., Cynthia Alberico and others
Defendant:
Carlos Castillo, Dave Heineman, Shane Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dale Adams v. Tyson Foods, et al
as 11-3180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dale Brent Adams
Defendant - Appellee:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Leland E. Tollett, Exec, Albert C. Zapanta, Exec and others
McBride v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2011cv00082
Plaintiff:
Tobi J McBride
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dale Adams v. Jesse Rivera, et al
as 11-2986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dale Brent Adams
Defendant - Appellee:
Jesse Rivera and Toby Shearer
Adams v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv03059
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Leland E Tollett, Albert C Zapanta and others
Movant:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sutton v. Arkansas State University et al
as 3:2011cv00123
Plaintiff:
Toby J Sutton
Defendant:
Arkansas State University , Patricia Bailey and Kellie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Arkansas State University
as 3:2011cv00075
Plaintiff:
Toby J Sutton
Defendant:
Arkansas State University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brill v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
as 0:2011cv00672
Plaintiff:
Toby B Brill
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
