Cases 111 - 120 of 363
Colbert v. Corizon LLC et al
as 6:2020cv03088
Defendant:
Kathy Barton, J. Cofield, Corizon LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Colbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 6:2020cv03135
Defendant:
Kathy Barton, Jeff Norman, Ralf Sake and others
Plaintiff:
John R. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burrell v. Corizon LLC et al
as 6:2020cv03129
Defendant:
Kathy Barton, J. Cofield, Dr. Ashokkumar R Chada and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Preston Burrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton v. Wright County MO et al
as 6:2020cv03075
Defendant:
Wright County MO and Hartville MO
Plaintiff:
Steven A Barton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton County, Missouri v. Allergan PLC et al
as 4:2020cv00387
Defendant:
Mallinckrodt, LLC, Michael Babich, Mylan Institutional, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Barton County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murphy v. Barton
as 3:2019cv00376
Defendant:
Barton
Plaintiff:
Lisa Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Landmark American Insurance Company v. Barton Law Group, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03204
Plaintiff:
Landmark American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Title Loan Company d/b/a The Loan Machine, Dennis J. Barton and The Barton Law Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Barton v. Regional Utility Service Systems (RUSS) et al
as 3:2019cv00079
Plaintiff:
Todd William Barton, Sr and Todd W. Barton, Sr
Defendant:
Bruce Hudson and Regional Utility Service Systems (RUSS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02158
Plaintiff:
Chase Stepp, Jonathan Albert, John Purcell and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies, LLC and Aearo Technologies LLC
Zarkevics et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02152
Plaintiff:
Joseph Baloh, Joshua Dreisbach, Jonathan Burrell and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
