Cases 111 - 120 of 191
Mathis v. King et al
as 4:2016cv04105
Plaintiff:
John Hussel Mathis, III
Defendant:
S. King, Golden Adams, M. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Karen
as 5:2016cv05227
Plaintiff:
Richard Mathis
Defendant:
Brad Karen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Moody et al
as 4:2016cv00449
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Johnson and Shelly Johnson
Defendant:
Mike Moody , Brian Mathis , Dana Wingert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mathis v. McGough et al
as 1:2016cv01032
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Mathis
Defendant:
Mike McGough, Bill Hickman, Kevin Pendleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. K-Mart Corporation
as 4:2015cv01514
Plaintiff:
Tracie Mathis
Defendant:
K-Mart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hopkins et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2015cv02773
Plaintiff:
Samuel R. Hopkins, Jr. and Doreen E. Mathis-Hopkins
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kothe et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02113
Plaintiff:
Ronald Kothe , Allene Kothe , Paul Edward Haney and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fernald et al v. Robertson et al
as 4:2015cv00211
Plaintiff:
Richard Jeffery Fernald and Catherine Mathis
Defendant:
Adam Robertson , James Potter , Joseph Breaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv01152
Plaintiff:
John D Mathis
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mathies v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv00291
Plaintiff:
Jim John Mathies
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
