Cases 121 - 130 of 3,719
Taylor v. Ridgel et al
as 5:2023cv05213
Plaintiff:
Justin Taylor
Defendant:
Sergeant Ridgel, Lieutenant Davis and Correctional Officer Jordan Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Siloam Springs Arkansas Hospital et al
as 5:2023cv05210
Plaintiff:
Gary Don Davis
Defendant:
Siloam Springs Arkansas Hospital, Dr. Malik Shahid and Drew Smithers, D.O.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Davis v. Williams
as 6:2023cv03356
Petitioner:
Matthew Davis
Respondent:
E Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03537
Plaintiff:
Janice Davis
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
The Estate of Joshua Charles Davis v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv01443
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Joshua Charles Davis
Defendant:
The United States of America, The Department of Veterans Affairs, The Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Garmon v. City of Northwoods, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv01403
Plaintiff:
Charles Garmon
Defendant:
City of Northwoods, Missouri, Samuel Davis and Michael Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Jonathan Davis
as 23-3430
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jonathan Davis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
