Cases 11 - 20 of 1,095
Rundquist: v. Crane et al
as 4:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Scott-Gregory Rundquist:
Defendant:
Sue Crane, Family Support Division, Andrew Bailey and others
Pate v. Haney
as 4:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
William Glen Pate, Jr
Defendant:
Sarah Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rosso v. Sears et al
as 5:2024cv05096
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Rosso
Defendant:
Sergeant Sarah Sears, Corporal Joel Minor, Corporal Dakota Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorletha Lambert v. Randy Philhours, et al
as 24-1831
Plaintiff:
Dorletha Lasha Lambert
Defendant:
Randy F. Philhours, Judge, Craighead County Circuit Court, Charlene Henry, Prosecuting Attorney, Craighead County, David Vaughn, Trial Court Circuit Clerk, Craighead County and others
Massimo et al v. Onyx Brands, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv05091
Defendant:
Onyx Brands, Inc., Onyx Brands, LLC, Onyx Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Sarah Reid Massimo and Sarah Reid Massimo Design, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Moody v. Falkenrath et al
as 2:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Moody
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Billy Dunbar, Almalee Dittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
Brower v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Sarah Brower
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Levac v. Haney et al
as 6:2024cv06047
Plaintiff:
Daniel Levac
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Sarah Haney, Sheriff Travis Hill, Sheriff Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
