Cases 11 - 20 of 10,040
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
Chastin Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thompson v. Haper et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Terrique Thompson
Defendant:
Unknown Haper, Unknown Womack, C. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Nix et al
as 6:2024cv06077
Plaintiff:
Michelle Reed
Defendant:
Franklin Jordan Nix and Johnson Bros. Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Johnson v. Carrols Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Carrols Corporation, Restaurant Brand International Inc., Burger King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01965
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Johnson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Jabari J Johnson
Defendant:
Davis, Michael Hale, Sneed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Buchanan County et al
as 6:2024cv02028
Plaintiff:
Ashley Marie Johnson and Douglas Alan Johnson
Defendant:
Buchanan County, Scott Buzynski, Steven W Vine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
New Prime, Inc. v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv03155
Plaintiff:
New Prime, Inc. a Nebraska corporation doing business as Prime Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas D Johnson, Jr. and Frank E Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Petition for Indemnity
Kamil Johnson v. United States
as 24-2049
Petitioner:
Kamil Hakeem Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Johnson v. Lew et al
as 0:2024cv01858
Plaintiff:
Chakotay Bobbie James Johnson
Defendant:
Daniel K. Lew, State of Minnesota Sixth Judicial District Public Defender and Center for Changing Lives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
