Cases 11 - 20 of 250
Potter v. Lett et al
as 4:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Jason M Potter
Defendant:
Stacey Lett, Michael Barrett, Alan D Pratzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. B Bar R Livestock Transportation, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Thomas Barrett
Defendant:
B Bar R Livestock Transportation, Inc., Luke Johnson and B Bar R Livestock Transportation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. State of Nebraska DHHS et al
as 4:2022cv03172
Plaintiff:
James E. Jones
Defendant:
State of Nebraska DHHS, Christopher D. Seifert, Dr. Rajeev Chattarveti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Matthew Robbins
as 22-2984
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Matthew Barrett Robbins
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mick v. Gibbons et al
as 4:2022cv03025
Plaintiff:
P.R. Bryan S. Mick and Bryan S. Mick
Defendant:
Deputy Barrett Gibbons, Deputy Lawrence Stump, Sheriff Dan Osmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cason v. USA
as 4:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Michael Barrett Cason
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. RLWRHC Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv00423
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
RLWRHC Inc. doing business as O'Leary's Pub and Barrett Prody
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Reception of Satellite Signals
Swan v. USA
as 1:2021cv00142
Petitioner:
Barrett C. Swan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
