Cases 11 - 20 of 13,641
Catlett v. West et al
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Angela Catlett
Defendant:
Mallory West, James Carter, David West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kistler v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv05037
Plaintiff:
Francis James Kistler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Milcendeau v. Stange
as 4:2024cv00378
Petitioner:
David James Milcendeau
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rondeau v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv02049
Plaintiff:
James Rondeau
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Richie et al v. Epien Medical Inc.
as 0:2024cv02060
Plaintiff:
JAMES CHANCE RICHIE AND AMANDA C. RICHIE, as Co-Trustees of the Richie Family Living Trust UAD
Defendant:
EPIEN MEDICAL INC., a Minnesota corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Garman v. Watson et al
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Challen Derek Garman
Defendant:
James Watson, Beth Skinner, Amber Davis and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02020
Plaintiff:
James C. Price
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Lang v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 0:2024cv02034
Plaintiff:
James Lang
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Tokio Marine American Insurance Company, Tokio Marine Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2609 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Thomas v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02041
Plaintiff:
James C. Thomas
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
