Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Harris Eddy Stanley, etc. v. State of Arkansas, et al
as 13-1271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harris Eddy Stanley Private Living Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Arkansas, William Bill James, John Johnson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3934
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harris Eddy Stanley Living Trust v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2012cv00735
Plaintiff:
Harris Eddy Stanley Private Living Trust
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, William Bill James, John Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Corman v. Stenehjem et al
as 3:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ray Corman
Defendant:
Wayne Stenehjem, Jonathan Byers, Ken Sorenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yang v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
Richard Yang
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, George Lombardi, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Vincenz
as 4:2011cv01163
Plaintiff:
William Bill Carter
Defendant:
Felix Vincenz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connie Burns Watkins, et al v. City of Paragould, et al
as 09-3811
Plaintiff - Appellee:
City of Paragould, Arkansas
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellant:
Connie Burns Watkins and Richard Watkins
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Gaskill, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of Paragould, J. D. Stephenson, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the Paragould Police Department, Todd Stovall, individually and in his official capacity as Captain with the Paragould Police Department and others
Scott v. Chastain et al
as 0:2009cv03170
Plaintiff:
Derrick Scott
Defendant:
M. Chastain, Fernando Castillo, David Szoke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
