Cases 191 - 200 of 349,794
Sayers v. Redlake Band of chippewa et al
as 0:2024cv01799
Petitioner:
Dezmyn Sayers
Respondent:
Redlake Band of chippewa and Redlake nation courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barton v. Boyd et al
as 8:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
James Barton
Defendant:
Taggart Boyd, Michele Wilholm, Case Manager Hassan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States v. Vicente Young
as 24-2016
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Vicente V. Young
Monderen v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
William Stange, Latonia Young-Griffin, Timothy Seabaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Brotherhood of Railway Signalmen v. BNSF Railway, Inc.
as 3:2024cv05021
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
Defendant:
BNSF Railway, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Harris v. Metro Transit Police Dept et al
as 0:2024cv01791
Plaintiff:
Joshua Harris
Defendant:
Metro Transit Police Dept, Nelson and Vang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
