Cases 21 - 30 of 10,046
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Jabari J Johnson
Defendant:
Davis, Michael Hale, Sneed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01965
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Johnson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Johnson et al v. Buchanan County et al
as 6:2024cv02028
Plaintiff:
Ashley Marie Johnson and Douglas Alan Johnson
Defendant:
Buchanan County, Scott Buzynski, Steven W Vine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Kamil Johnson v. United States
as 24-2049
Petitioner:
Kamil Hakeem Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
New Prime, Inc. v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv03155
Plaintiff:
New Prime, Inc. a Nebraska corporation doing business as Prime Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas D Johnson, Jr. and Frank E Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Petition for Indemnity
Johnson v. Lew et al
as 0:2024cv01858
Plaintiff:
Chakotay Bobbie James Johnson
Defendant:
Daniel K. Lew, State of Minnesota Sixth Judicial District Public Defender and Center for Changing Lives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rickie Tigue, Jr. v. Moses Jackson, et al
as 24-2029
Plaintiff:
Rickie Lynn Tigue, Jr.
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Warden, EARU, Brickey's Max, Johnson, Warden, EARU, Brickey's Max, Allison, Major, EARU, Brickey's Max and others
Rogers v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02063
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rogers
Defendant:
Sheriff Tom Hughes and Johnson County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chakotay Johnson v. Mark Zuckerberg
as 24-1999
Plaintiff:
Chakotay Bobbie James Johnson
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook Meta; Facebook.com
Justin Johnson v. Jacob Schurman, et al
as 24-2002
Plaintiff:
Justin Johnson
Defendant:
Jacob Schurman, in his individual capacity only and Christopher Taylor, in his individual capacity only
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
