Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 10,524
Tejeda v. Ripp et al
as 8:2024cv00196
Plaintiff: Vicente A. Tejeda
Defendant: David Joseph Ripp, Progressive Northern Ins Co. and Progressive insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Insurance
David Westover v. United States
as 24-2106
Petitioner: David Wayne Westover
Respondent: United States of America
Peeples v. McCormick et al
as 4:2024cv00464
Plaintiff: James Peeples
Defendant: David McCormick and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Byrd v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01986
Ward v. Banning
as 4:2024cv00459
Plaintiff: David Ward
Defendant: JB Banning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Milcendeau v. Stange
as 4:2024cv00378
Petitioner: David James Milcendeau
Respondent: Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunham v. Advance Correctional Health et al
as 4:2024cv00377
Plaintiff: David E Dunham
Defendant: Advance Correctional Health, Ashley Williams Weis, Robert Busetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Canada v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-2091
Plaintiff: Shawn Canada
Defendant: State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, In his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Minnesota Dept. of Corrections, et al., Andrew Karlsen, In their official capacity as the staff of Hearing & Release unit of Minnesota Dept. of Corrections Officers and others
Phelps v. Sgt. Cabieles et al
as 8:2024cv00188
Plaintiff: David Carl Phelps
Defendant: Sgt. Cabieles, Michael Meuller, Rob Jefferies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Hinrich et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff: Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant: Kyle Hinrich, Joshua Gregory Lindstrom, Adam Dean Elder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?