Cases 21 - 30 of 264
Williams v. State of Mississippi et al
as 0:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Muriel B. Ellis, Jim M. GreenLee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Otte v. Randolph County
as 23-1024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shawn Otte
Defendant / Appellee:
Randolph County
United States v. Randolph Lone Fight
as 23-1171
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Randolph Lone Fight
Randolph v. SERC, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv03247
Defendant:
Sharon Randolph, SERC, LLC and Donald Dreesen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
United States v. Anthony Davis
as 22-3576
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Davis, also known as Anthony Dawayne Randolph, also known as Anthony Latice Randolph, also known as John Duke
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Meeks v. Peters et al
as 4:2022cv00996
Plaintiff:
Antoine D. Meeks
Defendant:
Jarrod Peters, Randolph County Sheriff's Office, Chris Guisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Otte v. Randolph County
as 2:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otte
Defendant:
Randolph County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Enloe v. Randy Smith
as 22-2427
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joshua James Enloe
Respondent / Appellee:
Randy Smith, Jail Adminstrator, Randolph County Jail
Otte et al v. Randolph County Jail Staff et al
as 2:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otte and Tiffany Bell
Defendant:
Randolph County Jail Staff, Randolph County Sheriff Officer, Randolph County Children Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
