Cases 21 - 30 of 254
Hanes v. Sherburne County Jail et al
as 0:2023cv01191
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cameron Hanes
Defendant:
Sherburne County Jail, MenD Inc., Joel Brott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
Steven Johnson, Seth Lacroix, Ivan May and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Melton v. Calyxt, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv00540
Plaintiff:
Ralph Melton
Defendant:
Calyxt, Inc., Michael A. Carr, Yves J. Ribeill and others
Leaf et al v. Bear Country USA, Inc.
as 5:2023cv05013
Plaintiff:
Robert Leaf, Debbie Carr and Scott Lewis
Defendant:
Bear Country USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Prosser v. USHealth Advisors, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Christopher Prosser
Defendant:
USHealth Advisors, LLC, US Health Advisors, LLC, Patrick Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Carr v. McFadden et al
as 4:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
Justin Carr
Defendant:
McFadden, Daniels, Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jidoefor v. Sherburne County et al
as 0:2022cv02205
Plaintiff:
Okwuchukwu E. Jidoefor
Defendant:
Sherburne County, Joel Brott, Donald Starry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Daniel Horn
as 1:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Carr and Jimmy Jacoby Carr
Defendant:
Anamosa State Penitentiary and Daniel Horn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Tri-National Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Jackie Renea Carr
Defendant:
Tri-National Inc and Juan Manuel Ramos, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
