Cases 21 - 30 of 102
Miller v. Gibbs et al
as 4:2019cv00236
Petitioner:
Eric C Miller and Eric C. Miller
Respondent:
Randy Gibbs and Thomas J Miller
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Laiveil Harper v. Thomas Miller
as 19-2118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Laiveil De Von Harper
Defendant / Appellee:
Thomas J. Miller, Iowa Attorney General
Harper v. Miller
as 4:2019cv00010
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Defendant:
Thomas J Miller
Plaintiff:
Laiveil DeVon Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Maid to Perfection Global, Inc. v. Miller et al
as 1:2018cv00176
Defendant:
Andra J. Miller, Quality Services Unlimited, Inc., Joy A. Mastel and others
Plaintiff:
Maid to Perfection Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Liebing et al v. Sand et al
as 1:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Roger Liebing , Gary McCool , Alan Lucas and others
Defendant:
Robert Sand , Kevin Cmelik , Tom J Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liebing et al v. Sand et al
as 3:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Roger Liebing , Gary McCool , Alan Lucas and others
Defendant:
Robert Sand, Kevin Cmelik, Tom J Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Miller et al
as 4:2017cv00395
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Darren J. Miller, Norma Miller, Dental Professionals PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Gardner v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2017cv00391
Plaintiff:
Justin Gardner
Defendant:
Douglas A. Johnson, Kimberly Pankonin Miller, Matthew J. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03498
Plaintiff:
Norma J. Miller
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
