Cases 21 - 30 of 132
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bullard et al
as 0:2021cv01932
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Jason D. Bullard, Angela Romero-Bullard, Bullard Enterprises LLC and others
Receiver:
Receiver
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Little Rock Fam Planning Svcs, et al v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 21-2857
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Little Rock Family Planning Services, on behalf of itself and its patients, Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma, on behalf of itself and its patients, doing business as Planned Parenthood Great Plains and Janet R. Cathey, M.D. on behalf of herself and her patients
Defendant / Appellant:
Larry Jegley, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Pulaski County, Sylvia D. Simon, M.D. in her official capacity as Chairman of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Robert Breving, M.D., in his official capacity as officer/member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Little Rock Family Planning Services et al v. Jegley et al
as 4:2021cv00453
Defendant:
Marsha Boss, William L Rutledge, Melissa Faulkenberry and others
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma on behalf of itself and its patients doing business as Planned Parenthood Great Plains, Little Rock Family Planning Services and Janet Cathey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Frederick Hopkins, et al v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 21-1068
Defendant / Appellant:
Carl Riddell, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Dwayne Daniels, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Brian T. Hyatt, M.D., Officer and Member of the State Medical Board and others
Defendant:
Bob Cogburn, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, John B. Weiss, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, Steven L. Cathey, M.D., Chair of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Little Rock Family Planning Services, Inc. and Frederick W. Hopkins, M.D., M.P.H.
Appellant:
State of Kentucky, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Mohammed Siddiqui, et al v. ICE, et al
as 20-2762
Petitioner:
Sergio Gallego, Inemo Seimokuma Clement, Sauveur Victor and others
Respondent / Appellee:
Joel L. Brott, Sherburne County Sheriff, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Matthew Albence, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mohammed Siddiqui
Romero v. Saul
as 8:2020cv00326
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Angela Romero
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Adams et al v. Dost et al
as 4:2020cv00874
Plaintiff:
Laura Knox, Ona Lander, George Kieffer and others
Defendant:
Terri Dost, Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. and Fairshare Vacation Owners Association, Trustee of the Fairshare Vacation Plan Use Management Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Romero v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00576
Plaintiff:
Angel Romero
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Aundrea Culcalger, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate et al v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00558
Plaintiff:
Ceclia Tate
Defendant:
Aundrea Culcalger, Does 1-100, Correctional Officers Unnamed, 1-100, Jane and John Does, Wendy Kelley and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Jiles, Jr, Elijah McAlister, A Biddings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00793
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
