Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Williams v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 4:2015cv04007
Plaintiff:
Merry C. Williams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Williams et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv04890
Plaintiff:
Deborah D Williams and Randall C. Williams
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Sales Coporation, Stryker Ireland Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steven Raymie v. Polk County Jail, et al
as 14-2870
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Steven Richard Raymie
Defendant - Appellee:
Polk County Jail, Polk County Jail Staff, Polk County Jail, Mail Room Staff and others
Williams v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv00524
Plaintiff:
Steve C. Williams
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Beau DuBois v. C. Williams, et al
as 14-2293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Beau Lee DuBois
Defendant - Appellee:
C. Williams, Records Officer, Wrightsville and Grant Harris, Director of Records, ADOC
DuBois v. Williams et al
as 4:2013cv00503
Plaintiff:
Beau Lee DuBois
Defendant:
C Williams and Grant Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Delo
as 4:2013cv00137
Petitioner:
Ernest C. Williams
Respondent:
Paul K. Delo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. State of Missouri
as 4:2012cv02397
Petitioner:
Layette C. Williams
Respondent:
Herbert L. Bernsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Ertz et al
as 8:2012cv00433
Defendant:
Timothy R. Ertz and Fidelity National Title Group
Plaintiff:
Archbishop Jocita C. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Jackson et al
as 2:2012cv00210
Plaintiff:
Darryl C Williams
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, R Norton and Marcus Etherly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
