Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Mayo v. Norris et al
as 2:2009cv00066
Plaintiff:
Randy T Mayo
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Arkansas Department of Correction, Dennis Carnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carnes v. City of Platte City, Missouri
as 5:2009cv06010
Plaintiff:
Jason A Carnes
Defendant:
City of Platte City, Missouri
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carnes et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv05650
Plaintiff:
John Carnes and Patricia Carnes
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Jerry Ellis v. L. Norris, et al
as 08-2061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jerry J. Ellis, ADC #78658
Defendant - Appellee:
L. Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, R. Hobbs, Chief Deputy Director, ADC, G. Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC and others
Wacker et al v. Personal Touch Home Care, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00093
Plaintiff:
Sandra Wacker, Lorretta Lauth, Brian Voelkel and others
Defendant:
Personal Touch Home Care, Inc. and Personal Touch Home Care of MO, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chism v. Barrett et al
as 2:2007cv00026
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Chism
Defendant:
M.S. Barrett, M.C. Hollis, Stone Grissom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. Norris et al
as 5:2007cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jerry J Ellis
Defendant:
L Norris, R Hobbs, G Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chism v. Barrett et al
as 4:2007cv00121
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Chism
Defendant:
M. S. Barrett, M. C. Hollis, Stone Grissom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Amabide et al v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2007cv00806
Plaintiff:
Laurie Amabide, Laurie Amabide, Laurie Amabide and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
