Cases 31 - 40 of 15,527
Buckley v. Marshall et al
as 6:2024cv06065
Plaintiff:
Arsenio Buckley
Defendant:
Jailer Zack Marshall, Jailer Jodie Law and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westlake v. Eureka Springs Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Emerson Tron Westlake
Defendant:
Eureka Springs Police Department, Tim Holm and Does Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Norwood et al
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Michael Fred Allen Lester
Defendant:
Sheriff David Norwood, Jail Administrator Cameron Owens, Shift Supervisor Amanda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glidewell v. Callan et al
as 4:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Kim M. Glidewell
Defendant:
Dakota D. Callan, SS Sarge Farms, LLC, Does I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Contego Spa Designs, Inc. v. Soho Nails Spa LLC
as 4:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Contego Spa Designs, Inc.
Defendant:
Soho Nails Spa LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Murphy v. Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ryan Murphy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Randolph Baltz, Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Marbley v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jaster Lee Marbley
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pullen v. Bruce
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Wendel Pullen
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Matthew Williams
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wirth et al v. Burton et al
as 0:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Donald Joseph Wirth, Jr and Nicholas Thomas Stroeder
Defendant:
James Julis Burton, Jane Doe Number 1, Jane Doe Number 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
