Cases 31 - 40 of 292
Shrouf v. Adair County Missouri et al
as 2:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Gary Shrouf
Defendant:
Adair County, Missouri, Adair County Sheriff's Department, Adair County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shrouf et al v. Adair County, Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv01334
Plaintiff:
Gary Shrouf and City of Kirksville, Missouri
Defendant:
Adair County, Missouri, Adair County Sheriff's Department, Adair County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williamson v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
Maurice Williamson
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Looks Twice v. Williamson et al
as 4:2022cv04157
Plaintiff:
David Stephan Looks Twice and Kurt Douglas Andrews
Defendant:
Lori Williamson, Sara Jo Kegler, Dan Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Williamson v. Payne
as 4:2022cv01046
Plaintiff:
Anthony B Williamson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williamson v. Williamson Williamso/Williams
as 4:2022cv01018
Plaintiff:
Maurice Williamson
Defendant:
Mary Cathrine Sinal Williamson Williamso/Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cecil Williamson, Jr. v. Mike Heinricy
as 22-3096
Petitioner / Appellant:
Cecil Wallace Williamson, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Mike Heinricy, Warden-IMCC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
