Cases 41 - 50 of 674
Adkins et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02641
Plaintiff:
Todd Adkins, Temitope Amusa, Julio Avila and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Graham v. Gilley
as 0:2023cv02036
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
Warden John Gilley and John Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
William Graham v. United States
as 23-2953
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
United States of America
Graham v. USA
as 0:2023cv02498
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Fairbanks et al v. Twisted Mechanical LLC
as 0:2023cv01790
Plaintiff:
Matthew Fairbanks, Colin Beere, Jason Damman and others
Defendant:
Twisted Mechanical LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Sandra Graham v. ELN Enterprises, LLC, et al
as 23-2443
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Sandra Graham
Defendant / Appellant:
ELN Enterprises, LLC, doing business as Midwest CES, LLC, Jacob Johnsen and David Frandsen
Graham v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Cathleen A Shine and Brandi Lyn Graham
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fayetteville Public Library et al v. Crawford County, Arkansas et al
as 5:2023cv05086
Plaintiff:
Fayetteville Public Library, Eureka Springs Carnegie Public Library, Central Arkansas Library System and others
Defendant:
Crawford County, Arkansas, Chris Keith, Todd Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Lavon Lewis
Defendant:
Chris Johnson, Franklin Leron Graham and Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flemons v. Hatchett et al
as 2:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Aaron Flemons
Defendant:
Emma Hatchett, Angela Douglas, Tracy Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
