Cases 41 - 50 of 106
Ashley v. Moody et al
as 4:2018cv00498
Defendant:
J T Kearney, Gary M Arnold, P S Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larchick v. Bautista et al
as 7:2018cv03019
Defendant:
Esteban D. Bautista, Cash-Wa Distributing Co. of Kearney, Inc., Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Noah A. Larchick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Gonder v. Kearney
as 4:2018cv00417
Plaintiff:
Duane Gonder
Defendant:
Jeffery H Kearney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haire v. McKinney et al
as 4:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
Michael Haire
Defendant:
Jim McKinney, Jeremy Pullem, Kate Deal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kearney v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2017cv02378
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
David Kearney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kearney v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03508
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Kearney
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dancer et al v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 7:2017cv05003
Defendant:
Esteban D. Bautista and Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Third Party Plaintiff:
Cash-Wa Distributing Co. of Kearney
Plaintiff:
Kody L. Dancer and Megan Dancer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Whitten v. Brantner et al
as 4:2017cv00511
Plaintiff:
Dale Whitten
Defendant:
Matthew Brantner, Elaine Kross, David Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johns v. Corrections Medicine et al
as 4:2017cv01605
Plaintiff:
Brent Jeffrey Johns
Defendant:
Corrections Medicine, St. Louis County Health Dept., Steve Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johns v. St. Louis County Health Dept. et al
as 4:2017cv01570
Plaintiff:
Brent Jeffrey Johns
Defendant:
St. Louis County Health Dept., St. Louis County Jail, Steve Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
