Cases 41 - 50 of 122
Amy Krekelberg v. City of Minneapolis, et al
as 20-1362
Defendant / Appellant:
City of Minneapolis, Heather Young and Matthew Olson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Amy Elizabeth Krekelberg
Defendant:
John & Jane Does, John Wurm, Entity Does and others
Magness v. Kelley et al
as 4:2019cv00674
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Justine Minor, Justin Peter and others
Plaintiff:
John W Magness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurlbut v. Clark et al
as 6:2019cv06106
Defendant:
Officer John Doe #1, Warden Faust, Investigator Thomas Rowland and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Hurlbut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rojas et al v. Saulsberry et al
as 0:2019cv02208
Plaintiff:
Jose Filiberto Rojas, Dustin Jay Sanderlin, Ryan Schuck and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, Aearo Holdings, LLC, 3M Company and others
BlueLine Rental, LLC v. Rowland
as 1:2018cv00195
Plaintiff:
BlueLine Rental, LLC
Defendant:
Dana Rowland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowland v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2017cv03048
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Eugene Rowland, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Todd v. Hasty et al
as 2:2017cv04054
Plaintiff:
Rowland Todd
Defendant:
Greg Hasty , Don Williams and Beverly Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskyn v. Hunter et al
as 4:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
Charles Hoskyn
Defendant:
S Kyle Hunter, Karres D Manning, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Bolar v. Omaha Police Department et al
as 8:2017cv00071
Plaintiff:
Shelia M. Bolar
Defendant:
Tom Caka, Does 1-50, Omaha Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilliam v. Simmons et al
as 2:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gilliam, III
Defendant:
Aric W Simmons, Captola M Clinkscale, Brett C Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
