Cases 41 - 50 of 138
Johnson v. Proctor et al
as 4:2019cv00360
Defendant:
Willard Proctor, Jr, Arkansas Department of Community Correction, Asa Hutchinson and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgeon et al v. Faughn et al
as 3:2018cv00214
Defendant:
Brodie Faughn, Jeff Sanders, Herbert Todd and others
Plaintiff:
James O'Hara, Whitney Tracy, Shane Willard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Orrock et al
as 5:2018cv05049
Defendant:
Jason Fanning, Jeff Slattery, City of Martin, South Dakota and others
Plaintiff:
Britt T. Long
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
County of Bennett, South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murawski et al v. ZNS Cargo, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv05010
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Murawski and Willard S Murawski
Defendant:
ZNS Cargo, Inc., DFS Equipment Leasing, LLC and Davranov Bakhodir
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Billings v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv05277
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Willard Billings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garman v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03970
Plaintiff:
Willard Garman, Jr.
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03390
Plaintiff:
Willard Gregory
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Willard Berry v. Brian Doss, et al
as 17-2565
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Willard Eugene Berry
Defendant - Appellant:
Brian Doss, SOD, NEACCC, Carol McFarlin, Counselor, NEACCC and Karen Hardesty, Treatment Supervisor, NEACCC
Defendant:
Jermey Sparks, ARO, NEACCC, Henson, Champlin, NEACCC, Coleman, Captain, NEACCC and others
Dunn et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv01846
Plaintiff:
Peggy Dunn , Theresa Archie , Delia Armendariz and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Compaines, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
