Cases 51 - 60 of 349
Ronald Jordan v. James Coffman, et al
as 22-2752
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald K. Jordan
Defendant / Appellee:
James H. Coffman, Steve Martin, Anne L. Precythe and others
Washington v. Pipelife Jet Stream, Inc.
as 5:2022cv05165
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Washington, Miles Matthews, Jimmy Beck and others
Defendant:
Pipelife Jet Stream, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Martin v. Abdullah et al
as 2:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ray Martin
Defendant:
J Abdullah, B Andrews, B Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rick Searcy v. Central Intelligence Agency, et al
as 22-1873
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rick Lee Searcy
Defendant / Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, George A. Pickett, Nina Pickett "The Estate of George Pickett" and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv03152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Code v. Chauvin et al
as 0:2022cv01438
Plaintiff:
Zoya Code
Defendant:
Officer Derek Chauvin, Ross Blair and Minneapolis, City of, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ford v. Blair
as 4:2022cv00563
Petitioner:
Arieon D. Ford
Respondent:
Paul Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronald Jordan v. James Coffman, et al
as 22-1939
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald K. Jordan
Defendant / Appellee:
James H. Coffman, Steve Martin, Anne L. Precythe and others
Flynn v. County of Washington et al
as 8:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
Special Admin Jeremiah Flynn and Jeremiah Flynn
Defendant:
County of Washington, City of Blair, Nebraska, Kelly McManigal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Aaron Broussard v. Thomas Hollenhorst, et al
as 22-1774
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Aaron Rhy Broussard
Defendant / Appellee:
Thomas More Hollenhorst, Charles John Kovats, Jr., Melinda Williams and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
