Cases 51 - 60 of 9,305
David Mitchell, II v. Douglas County, et al
as 24-1839
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell, II
Defendant:
Douglas County, a Nebraska Political Subdivision, Donald W. Kleine, in his individual and official capacity as Douglas County Attorney, Douglas County Attorney's Office and others
Bey v. Evergy Metro Inc, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Marquette Lumumba Mugabe Bey
Defendant:
Evergy Metro Inc, Missouri, Spire Energy, KC Water and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 American Disability Act
Kirn et al v. iAero Group, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv02020
Plaintiff:
Sharon Kirn and Kenneth Kirn
Defendant:
iAero Group, LLC, iAero Group Holdco 6, LLC, Swift Air Travel, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Airline Crash
East Ridge Acres Community LLC et al v. ERA Homes LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
East Ridge Acres Community LLC, Magic City Community LLC and Wheatland Village Community LLC
Defendant:
ERA Homes LLC, ERA MHC LLC, Magic City Homes LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Bynum v. City of Bridgton MO. et al
as 4:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Darryl R. Bynum
Defendant:
City of Bridgton MO. and St. Louis County Judicial System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saladino v. Mad City Home Improvement, LLC
as 0:2024cv01419
Plaintiff:
Alisha Saladino
Defendant:
Mad City Home Improvement, LLC doing business as Mad City Windows & Baths
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Massey v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Jesse Leonard Massey
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Springfield Police Department and multiple unknown officers, City of Springfield, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeremy Dunn, et al v. Shane Penfield, et al
as 24-1804
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dunn and Kevin Love
Defendant:
Shane Penfield, in his official and individual capacities, Penfield Law Firm Professional LLC, Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
