Cases 51 - 60 of 1,002
Campbell v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2023cv05063
Plaintiff:
Shelia Campbell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Campbell v. Brockman et al
as 4:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Jason H Campbell
Defendant:
Brockman, Huffman, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
William Tanton, Mark Bailey, Andrew Ito and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Nygard v. Orono, City of et al
as 0:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Jay Thomas Nygard
Defendant:
Orono, City of, Dennis Sabourin Walsh, Correy Farniok and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
R.F. v. Roraback et al
as 6:2023cv06023
Plaintiff:
R. F.
Defendant:
Daniel Roraback, Tanner Campbell, Shawn Hervey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Altedias Campbell
as 23-1408
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Altedias Maurice Campbell
Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Dayle Wayne Campbell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Payton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Alana Payton, Cole M. Radicic, Matthew Whelihan and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Campbell v. Molder
as 3:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jacob Campbell and Jacob K Campbell
Defendant:
Trumann District Court, Poinsett County Detention Center and Kevin Molder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
