Cases 51 - 60 of 169
Chandler v. Cabela's, LLC et al
as 8:2018cv00454
Plaintiff:
Mary Chandler
Defendant:
Cabela's Inc., Cabela's LLC and Cabela's, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ball-Bey v. Chandler et al
as 4:2018cv01364
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, KYLE CHANDLER, RONALD VAUGHN and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS BALL-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klingensmith v. Cruz et al
as 5:2018cv05153
Defendant:
Nurse Heather Trimmer, Deputy Megan Rutledge, Lieutenant Robin Holt and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Klingensmith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv05061
Plaintiff:
Carl Chandler
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Blackstock v. Hart et al
as 8:2018cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jesse Blackstock
Defendant:
Wayne Chandler, Scott Frakes, April Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullins v. Julian et al
as 4:2018cv00324
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Sullins
Defendant:
Randy Julian, Jason Martin, Brandon Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lenderink v. James River Insurance Company
as 4:2018cv00520
Plaintiff:
Chandler Lenderink
Defendant:
James River Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chandler et al v. Arvest Bank
as 3:2018cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jessica Chandler and Adam King
Defendant:
Arvest Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Register et al v. Watson
as 4:2018cv00161
Plaintiff:
Charles Register , Diana Schooley , Melissa Chandler and others
Defendant:
Rosemary Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pieper v. Nebraska Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv03018
Defendant:
CPL. M. Bruyette, Amanda Chadwick, Wayne Chandler and others
Former L.C.C Unit Administrator:
Rick Hardgreaves
Former L.C.C Warden:
Mario Peart
Plaintiff:
John W. Pieper
Former Captain At L.C.C:
Paula Sparks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
