Cases 51 - 60 of 129
Roach v. Dooley et al
as 4:2013cv04146
Petitioner:
Arley Roach
Respondent:
Bob Dooley, Marty Jackley, Janine Kern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Orrick et al v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation
as 4:2013cv02149
Plaintiff:
Tomika Roberts , Cindy Anderton , Carol Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Smithkline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goade et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv05123
Plaintiff:
Mark Jason Goade and Marcella Janine Gaode
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. , Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Brian Ipsen, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Federal Trade Commission v. Money Now Funding, LLC et al
as 8:2013mc00072
Defendant:
Affiliate Marketing Group, LLC, Affinity Technologies, LLC, Jennifer Beckman and others
Receiver:
Peter S. Davis
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Wills v. Jesson et al
as 0:2013cv01973
Plaintiff:
Wesley Elmer Wills
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Kevin Moser, Scott Benoit and others
Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the et al
as 0:2013cv01074
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson, Cal Ludeman and others
Sheridan v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2012cv00681
Plaintiff:
Janine Louise Sheridan
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Gustafson et al v. Poitra et al
as 4:2012cv00129
Plaintiff:
Darrel Gustafson and Janine Gustafson
Defendant:
Linus Poitra and Raymond Poitra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Marks et al v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 0:2012cv01867
Plaintiff:
Janine Marks and Hope Guardianship Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Folson v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv01137
Plaintiff:
Al Folson
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Govenor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
