Cases 51 - 60 of 7,338
Hood-Bey v. Department of Motor Vehicles et al
as 8:2024cv00255
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Jessica Walker, Officer Noah Zendejas (2513) and others
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Hood-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darek K Ridpath DDS PC et al v. Change Healthcare Inc et al
as 0:2024cv02363
Defendant:
Optum, Inc., Change Healthcare, Inc. and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Darek K. Ridpath, D.D.S., P.C. and Moe Karami, D.D.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Marques Tavron v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-2275
Defendant:
White, W/M, C.O., E.A.R.M.U., ADC, B. King, Sgt., E.A.R.M.U., ADC, Kentara Coleman, C.O., E.A.R.M.U., ADC and others
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Lyndon Elder v. J. Smith, et al
as 24-2235
Defendant:
Chief of Police Chris Chapmond, Doe, Hot Springs Police Officers 1-3, K. May, Hot Spring Police Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Elder
Yancey v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Defendant:
K Matthews, Dexter Payne, T Allison and others
Plaintiff:
John B Yancey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2184
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hudson v. Gyolai et al
as 0:2024cv02038
Defendant:
Bradley Behr, Kristen Gyolai, Fields Law Office Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Hudson, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
K.D.H. v. Boone County, Missouri et al
as 2:2024cv04084
Defendant:
Christie McCalebb, John Doe #2, Danielle Young and others
Plaintiff:
K. D. H.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
