Cases 61 - 70 of 2,507
McSean v. Foot et al
as 4:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Kelly McSean
Defendant:
Roy Foot, Unknown Halek, Katie Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murillo v. Miller et al
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Leslie C Murillo
Defendant:
Phillip Miller, White County, Arkansas and Jeff Everetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Happy Stompingbear v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 24-1011
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear, also known as Chris Ward
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, former Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, ADC, Marvin Evans and others
Chris White v. Dexter Payne
as 24-1352
Petitioner:
Chris White
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, in his official capacity
Masiker v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01215
Plaintiff:
Aaron Scott Masiker
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, White County Detention Center and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Immel v. Robertson et al
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lee Immel
Defendant:
Sheila Robertson and Jacob White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sebastian v. Bullock et al
as 4:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Aaron Sebastian
Defendant:
Dan Bullock, Greg Armstrong, Randy Camden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lungaho v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Mujera Benjamin Lungaho
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Dane Barnum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
William Demont White, Jr.
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frank v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv03768
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Frank
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Dilworth Police department, Schlee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
