Cases 71 - 80 of 10,831
United States v. Alton Robertson,, Jr.
as 24-1739
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alton Ray Robertson,, Jr.
State of Missouri et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Miguel A. Cardona and United States Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lundy v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Rossi Byron Lundy, Jr. and Rossi Byron Lundy, Jr
Defendant:
Tracy Johnson, Steve Warner, Michael Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur Lee, Jr. v. United States
as 24-1737
Petitioner:
Arthur Tyrone Lee, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Webb v. USA
as 4:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Michael B Webb, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Parks v. Taylor et al
as 2:2024cv02046
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Orion Parks
Defendant:
Officer Shawn Taylor, Judge Mike Medlock, Jeremiah Corbitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frazier v. Buckner
as 1:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Will Frazier, Jr.
Respondent:
Michelle Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leake v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Leake, Jr. and Lawrence J. Leake, Jr.
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Shorty v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility et al
as 4:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Shorty, Jr
Defendant:
Pulaski County Regional Detention Center, Department of Human Services and Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
