Cases 81 - 90 of 2,840
Harper v. Monnig et al
as 4:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Christopher Louis Harper
Defendant:
Shane Monnig, Timothy Baker, Adam Lemmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Woods v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Woods and Demetrius L Woods
Defendant:
Doe, Gary Musslelwhite, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Foley et al
as 4:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Brian Dorsey and Brian J. Dorsey
Defendant:
Trevor S. Foley, Myles Strid, Richard Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Beverage et al
as 5:2024cv04006
Plaintiff:
Cody L Smith
Defendant:
Steve Beverage, Sr, Kelsey Speed, Angla Kolker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith v. Beverage et al
as 4:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Cody L. Smith
Defendant:
Steve Beverage, Sr., Kelsey Speed, Angla Kolker and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keystone Hospitality, LLC v. Landers et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Keystone Hospitality, LLC
Defendant:
Jake Landers, Trimark USA, LLC, Gregg H Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Hawkins v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Shallon Hawkins
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paro v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2024cv03023
Plaintiff:
Adam Paro
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
