Cases 81 - 90 of 11,443
Soard v. Budnik et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Thomas Soard
Defendant:
Christopher Budnik, Tasha Griffin, McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reggie Huff v. Brookings Police Department, et al
as 24-1776
Plaintiff:
Reggie D. Huff
Defendant:
Brookings Police Department, Dawn M. Elshere, Nominal Defendant, David Erickson and others
Hu-Yu, Inc. v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01903
Plaintiff:
Hu-Yu, Inc. d/b/a City Wok
Defendant:
ASR Group International, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc., Domino Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Nadeau v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv03011
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Nadeau
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mosley v. Layton et al
as 2:2024cv04047
Plaintiff:
Aceon Deon Mosley
Defendant:
Justin D. Layton, Raina Martin, Letitia Dawn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Bates v. United States
as 24-1643
Petitioner:
Jason D. Bates
Respondent:
United States of America
New Prime, Inc. v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv03155
Plaintiff:
New Prime, Inc. a Nebraska corporation doing business as Prime Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas D Johnson, Jr. and Frank E Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Petition for Indemnity
Moseley v. Henderson et al
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Kelshaun D Moseley
Defendant:
Henderson, Watson, Ahka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy Rindahl v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Ex-Secretary of Health, Joan Adam, Interim Secretary of Health, Kristi Noem, Governor for the State of South Dakota and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
