Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Lamplighter Village Apartments LLLP et al v. City of St. Paul
as 0:2021cv00413
Plaintiff:
Wellington-NFLP, LLC, Woodstone Limited Partnership, Rockwood Place, LP and others
Defendant:
City of St. Paul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. $69,258.00 in U.S. Currency
as 0:2020cv01729
Defendant:
$69,258.00 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Dayton D Amotozio, Nicole M Amotozio and Donovan D Amotozio
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
Camp v. City of Dayton et al
as 0:2019cv02806
Plaintiff:
Matthew Campbell and Matthew Camp
Defendant:
City of Dayton, Officer Brant Standridge and Police Chief Paul Enga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson v. Walz et al
as 0:2019cv02612
Defendant:
Bill Pal-Freeman, Michelle Smith, Eddie Miles and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Favors v. Lourey et al
as 0:2019cv02094
Defendant:
Jeannine Hebert, Kevin Moser, Peter Puffer and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv01590
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Clervrain v. Dayton et al
as 0:2019cv00965
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lori R. Swanson, John Sandweg and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2018cv03250
Defendant:
Brenda Smith, Doug Witte, Deborah MacNeill and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. Dayton et al
as 0:2018cv03004
Defendant:
Brenda Smith, Stephan Cranna, Brandon Huynh and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Dayton et al
as 0:2018cv02959
Respondent:
Mark Dayton, Emily Piper Johnson, Lori Swanson and others
Petitioner:
Byron Kenneth Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
