Cases 1 - 10 of 88
DeWitt v. Newton Correctional Facility
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Paul DeWitt
Defendant:
Newton Correctional Facility
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keen v. Cook et al
as 6:2024cv03086
Plaintiff:
CeCil Keen
Defendant:
Darin Cook and DeWitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeWitt v. Newton Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Paul DeWitt
Defendant:
Newton Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dewitt v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02417
Plaintiff:
Dawn Dewitt
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Holliman v. Purdy et al
as 2:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Antonio Terrell Holliman
Defendant:
Charlotte Purdy and DeWitt Era Enterprise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Siers v. DeWitt et al
as 5:2022cv06059
Plaintiff:
Donovan Siers
Defendant:
Lydia DeWitt, Mike Horn and Mitch Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lillie v. Iowa, State of et al
as 5:2022cv04012
Defendant:
Unity Point Health, Iowa, State of, Woodbury County, Iowa and others
Plaintiff:
Jean Lynn Lillie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Jo Anne Saucier, et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al
as 22-1460
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jo Anne Saucier, Cheryle Hanzel, Julie Johnson and others
Defendant / Appellee:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Defendant:
Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and Doe Manufacturers, 1-100
Saucier et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00984
Plaintiff:
Jo Anne Saucier, Cheryle L Hanzel, Julie Johnson and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv01193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
