Cases 1 - 10 of 3,688
Davis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02137
Plaintiff:
Gail Davis
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Abdikarim v. Williams et al
as 0:2024cv02059
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Hunter Williams and John Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. USA
as 4:2024cv00754
Petitioner:
Quintin Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Shawn Canada v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-2091
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, In his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Minnesota Dept. of Corrections, et al., Andrew Karlsen, In their official capacity as the staff of Hearing & Release unit of Minnesota Dept. of Corrections Officers and others
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Jabari J Johnson
Defendant:
Davis, Michael Hale, Sneed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Ennen Eye Center et al
as 2:2024cv02067
Plaintiff:
Jerry K Davis and Susan L. Davis
Defendant:
Ennen Eye Center, Dr. Parker Pratt and Dr. Randy Ennen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
United States v. Randy Davis
as 24-2056
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Randy Edward Davis
Abdikarim v. Kahl et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Investigator Logan Kahl, Unknown Officers, Chief David Zibolski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. King et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Defendant:
Josephus J King, Jackson, Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls et al v. Sanders et al
as 4:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Ruthie Walls, Jennifer Reynolds, Chandra Williams Davis and others
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Jacob Oliva, Sarah Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
