Cases 1 - 10 of 559
Christopher Boyer v. Iowa State Patrol, et al
as 24-2315
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Boyer
Defendant:
Iowa State Patrol and Alex Dinkla, in his individual capacity
Howard v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Norris B Howard, Sr
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Jimmy Hudson, Joseph Gorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruff v. DRM Inc.
as 8:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Alex Ruff
Defendant:
DRM Inc. doing business as Arby's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jeffery Weisman, et al v. Barnes Jewish Hospital, et al
as 24-1864
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Weisman and Strategic Biomedical, Inc.
Defendant:
Barnes Jewish Hospital, BJC Healthcare, Washington University, also known as Washington University School of Medicine and others
Wycoff v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Wycoff
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jeff Barteff, Mike Heinricy and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whirlwind Horse v. Reyes et al
as 4:2024cv04105
Petitioner:
Michael R. Whirlwind Horse, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Alex Reyes and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krumback v. Reyes
as 4:2024cv03100
Petitioner:
Jason Krumback
Respondent:
Alex Reyes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shawn Canada v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-2091
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, In his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Minnesota Dept. of Corrections, et al., Andrew Karlsen, In their official capacity as the staff of Hearing & Release unit of Minnesota Dept. of Corrections Officers and others
Gantman v. Farahan
as 0:2024cv01195
Plaintiff:
David Gantman
Defendant:
Afshin "Alex" Farahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
