Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States v. Michael Ashford
as 23-3395
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Lynn Ashford
Ashford v. USA
as 4:2023cv03017
Petitioner:
Devin L. Ashford
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ashford v. Woods
as 2:2022cv01088
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Ashford
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ashford v. Woods
as 4:2022cv01088
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Ashford
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ashford v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2022cv00827
Plaintiff:
Charles Ashford and Charles Edward Ashford
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. John and Stephanie Ingram, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00451
Plaintiff:
Elaine M. Taylor
Defendant:
John and Stephanie Ingram, LLC, American Zurich Insurance Company, Quality Living Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Ashford v. Deen et al
as 4:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Charles Ashford
Defendant:
Tina Deen and S Shipman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Ashford, et al v. Marcen Hendrix, et al
as 22-1115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy L. Ashford and Timothy L. Ashford, PC LLO
Defendant / Appellee:
Marcen Hendrix, in her official capacity and her individual capacity, State of Nebraska, Douglas County and others
Andrews et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02143
Plaintiff:
Killian Andrews, Manuel Arevalo, George Ashford and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
