Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Edward Wright v. Department of Veterans Affairs, et al
as 22-1471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward C. Wright
Defendant / Appellee:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of General Counsel, Lawances Jackson, House Keeping, Tamia Simmon, House Keeping and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Edward Wright v. Department of Veterans Affairs, et al
as 20-1941
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward C. Wright
Defendant / Appellee:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of General Counsel, Lawances Jackson, House Keeping, Does 1-2, Shuttle Driver and V.A. Counselor and others
Odom v. Does
as 2:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
Charles Powell Odom
Defendant:
Does, Taylor, Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. USA
as 4:2016cv00244
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gregory C. Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Webb v. Cantrell et al
as 2:2015cv00069
Plaintiff:
Brian J N Webb
Defendant:
Cantrell, C Wright and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Parker v. Moses Jackson, III
as 14-2565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald Parker
Defendant - Appellee:
Moses Jackson, III, Captain, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Mike Beebe, Governor of Arkansas, Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Wright et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 0:2013cv01774
Plaintiff:
Debora S. Wright and William C. Wright
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edward Wright v. Ray Hobb
as 11-3305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Edward C. Wright
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Daniel Cincoski v. Burl, et al
as 11-3164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Cincoski
Defendant - Appellee:
Burl, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Ball, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Peter Edwards, Dr., East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
