Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Murphy et al v. Thompson et al
as 0:2023cv01087
Plaintiff: Daniel Lee Murphy and Rosemarie Murphy
Defendant: Patricia Linda Thompson and Margaret Malotte Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Cincoski v. Weatherington We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02065
Plaintiff: Daniel Lee Cincoski
Defendant: Dr. Weatherington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Daniel Cook v. Marcy Stroud
as 23-1354
Petitioner / Appellant: Daniel Lee Cook
Respondent / Appellee: Marcy Stroud, Warden
Cook v. Stroud
as 4:2023cv00031
Petitioner: Daniel Lee Cook
Respondent: Marcy Stroud
Interested Party: Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Stroud We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00004
Petitioner: Daniel Lee Cook
Respondent: Marcy Stroud
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cincoski v. Lindsay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv05042
Plaintiff: Daniel Lee Cincoski
Defendant: Circuit Judge Mark Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cincoski v. Helder et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv05022
Plaintiff: Daniel Lee Cincoski
Defendant: Sheriff Tim Helder, Probation Officer Dieum Nyugen and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boster v. Saul
as 6:2020cv03173
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Daniel Lee Boster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daniel Stone v. United States
as 20-1711
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant: Daniel Lee Stone
Stone v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00009
Petitioner: Daniel Lee Stone
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?