Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Judy Dey v. Bette Coughlin, et al
as 21-3681
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Judy Dey
Defendant / Appellee:
Bette Coughlin, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Patrick Michael Hennessey and Estate of Patrick Michael Hennessey
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03179
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1154
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03114
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Dey et al v. Conway Urban Air LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00790
Defendant:
UATP Management LLC and Conway Urban Air LLC
Plaintiff:
Samantha McBride, Emily Dey and Madison Barnhill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Campbell et al v. Baylard, Billington, Dempsey & Jensen, P.C. et al
as 4:2017cv02390
Defendant:
Lawrence Deis, Baylard, Billington, Dempsey & Jensen, P.C., Anonymous Topix Posters and others
Plaintiff:
Dave Campbell and Catrenia Dawn Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gadekan v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 4:2012cv03208
Defendant:
1-100 Unknown USDA Officials, 1-100 non-USDA employees, Beverly Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
John A. Gadekan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Kath v. Federal Correctional Institute et al
as 0:2010cv00680
Plaintiff:
Kirm G. Kath
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institute, United States of America, Joyce Anderson and others
David Jansen v. United States
as 09-1696
Petitioner - Appellant:
David Dey Jansen
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
McCourt v. Rios et al
as 0:2008cv06411
Plaintiff:
Michael Shawn McCourt
Defendant:
R. Rios, J. Anderson, J. Dey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
