Cases 1 - 10 of 565
Carney v. Welch et al
as 4:2024cv00792
Defendant:
Morgan E Welch, Doctors Company, Central Arkansas Radiation Therapy Institute Inc doing business as CARTI and others
Plaintiff:
John Michael Carney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01199
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv02880
Defendant:
Gregory LeKatz, Kenneth Peterson, Minnesota Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Lindsey Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Buckner et al
as 6:2024cv03201
Defendant:
Wade, Nurse Tiffany, T Stell and others
Plaintiff:
David Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marques Tavron v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-2275
Defendant:
White, W/M, C.O., E.A.R.M.U., ADC, B. King, Sgt., E.A.R.M.U., ADC, Kentara Coleman, C.O., E.A.R.M.U., ADC and others
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Joshua Stockton v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-2209
Defendant:
WellPath, LLC, Ronald Stukey, Doctor, Well Path LLC (Pine Bluff), Kennie Bolden, Deputy Warden, ADC Compliance Division (originally named as Boulden) and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Matthew Stockton
Thurman v. Rug Doctor
as 4:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Thurman
Defendant:
Rug Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Smith v. McClean et al
as 4:2024cv04051
Defendant:
Jana Tallant, Does Badge Number 11-6, Todd Tallant and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Dale Smith, Jr. and Curtis Wayne Smith, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
